> >Are the lack of Javascript and cookies a bug, or a feature ?
> I am not a fan of JS bloat, but I definitely appreciate when I can 
> click once/hover instead of typing everything by hand / open a new webpage.
> > I would like to ask again what new features you want to bring to the 
> > table, so to speak. Cookies to remember your name and email/link make
> > sense. What about things like giving the thread OP an option to enable
> > IDs in the thread?
> I don't think that matters. Classic Kareha with sane JS UI 4chan features like post preview
> by hovering the >>666 kind of link would work, as for me. There are literally no textboards 
> like that as far as I concerned.
> But of course its backend should be more maintainable that Perl5 script from early 2000's.
> > As the author of the textboard article on Wikipedia and several 
> > textboard scripts, my opinion is that tags have a lot to offer these
> > kinds of boards. Per-thread ATOM feeds, as well. 
> Booru garbage? I don't like it, I never use those tags. And I think no one does,
> at least on non-niche booru imageboards (like Neboard, probably the only one 
> I visit from time to time).
> Also, you must be ashamed of yourself to write Wikipedia articles for free. ヽ(´ー｀)ノ
> > I've also wondered
> > about how tripcodes (pseudo registration) could be expanded in the 
> > modern age: maybe Oauth or PGP-based identities?
> > The nice thing about a tripcode is that it can be used on other sites
> > in this family of forums. The downsides is that they are easily 
> > spoofed and not especially user friendly. Being able to post as an 
> > off-site identity, eg your Twitter/Mastodon/email (opt in) has its
> > advantages.... while it was generally a failure, I still think 1chan
> > was notable in its approach to handling identities (every user has an 
> > account, anonymous by default, checkbox to show "user" a la "CAPCODES")
> How about forcing anonymity? Tripfags and other pseudonymous folx could go to twitter.
> =====================================================
> ==-------------------------------------------------==
> =====================================================
> Ok, if you are asking about real novelties, I think I could create an Emacs client. 
> But it's also not a brand new feature, some guy already made it for SchemeBBS.
> To be honest, I would better think of finding some good old format and 
> refresh it with modern web dev tech. Maybe, not even Kareha/2ch, but lost and forgotten.
> I couldn't find anything more interesting yet, though.
> >65-80 chars per line
> >is a nice, sane standard.
> Ok, nigger, but why wouldn't you do it on server-side? Simply insert \n every 60-80 chars 
> after some whitespace, when your PHP script compiles an HTML page.

If you want to see what a 2ch-type BBS with tons of kewl features looks 
like - one that doesn't require a seperate browser/app to view/use the 
extra features liek 2ch/5ch does - see open2ch: https://open2ch.net

(you can use this page to see the most active boards: 
https://open2ch.net/dev/toukei/ )

They've got quotelink previews on hover and inline reply previews, but 
those are probably the least interesting features of all. They've got 
oekaki, images via embeds, a multiroom chatbox, polls, VoIP chat/stream-
ing, a way of registering users to prevent copycats including the abili-
ty to have an avatar, realtime thread rankings, advanced thread modera-
tion tools for thread makers that allow them to assign other posters as 
mods or ban users from the thread, a map function, board creation, and 
moar

It really makes the Western-invented term "textboard" sound kinda 
stupid, doesn't it? ヽ(´ー｀)ノ

Reference: 2022/08/16(Tue) 16:51:00