3583.    User: Anonymous   Post date: 2022/05/08(Sun) 21:21:49          
https://2ch.sh/src/2355.png
┐(゚~゚)┌

3584. >Anonymous-san   User: Anonymous   Post date: 2022/05/08(Sun) 21:30:19          

3585. >Anonymous-san   User: Anonymous   Post date: 2022/05/08(Sun) 21:35:37          
> > https://2ch.sh/src/2355.png
> > ┐(゚~゚)┌
> https://2ch.sh/src/2356.png
> ヽ(´ー`)ノ

The octagon that was supposed to be b0rked looks more perfect to me
than the perfect octagon looks to the l33ts (;´Д`)

Reference: 2022/05/08(Sun) 16:30:19

3587. >Anonymous-san   User: Anonymous   Post date: 2022/05/08(Sun) 22:22:21          
> > https://2ch.sh/src/2356.png
> > ヽ(´ー`)ノ
> The octagon that was supposed to be b0rked looks more perfect to me
> than the perfect octagon looks to the l33ts (;´Д`)

I specifically designed it to look perfect on MS PGothic (and fonts 
that are metrically-compatible with MS PGothic, like Monafont) so that 
it would be really obvious to tell if that's what the problem was, as 
opposed to a browser simply falling back to the default Latin monospace 
font which is a whole different kind of b0rked ヽ(´ー`)ノ

Reference: 2022/05/08(Sun) 16:35:37

4 posts found. ←Return